[joe-frank-list] Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 55, Issue 5

[Larry Dunn]

I've always wondered why I can't find any record of
the filing with the court in Lexis.  I searched for
it, came up empty, and came to the conclusion that
this is all an urban legend of sorts.


--- joe-frank-list-request at armory.com wrote:

> Send joe-frank-list mailing list submissions to
> 	joe-frank-list at armory.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 
>
http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	joe-frank-list-request at armory.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	joe-frank-list-owner at armory.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of joe-frank-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. The Scandalous Origins of "After Hours"
> (Levent)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 15:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Levent <ghastly_fop at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [joe-frank-list] The Scandalous Origins of
> "After Hours"
> To: joe-frank-list at armory.com
> Message-ID:
> <392980.19932.qm at web52508.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> It's been discussed on the list before (the list
> itself is quoted in this article), but here's an
> interesting piece about the "After Hours"
> controversy:
>
http://www.panopticist.com/2008/05/the_scandalous_origins_of_martin_scorseses_after_hours.html
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Joe Frank Mailing List
> joe-frank-list at armory.com
>
http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list
> 
> 
> End of joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 55, Issue 5
> *********************************************
>