[joe-frank-list] Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 35, Issue 17
spblat at gmail.com
Mon Jun 26 12:22:51 PDT 2006
Amen. I for one would much rather see someone participate in the
discussion and accidentally include the whole digest in a reply than
be yelled at and possibly wander off in search of a less uptight
community. Joe Frank fans are a rare breed; let's stick together.
Rules are good, why not. May I suggest the Joe Frank Wiki as a place
to maintain an "about the mailing list and how to behave there" page.
I have created such a page (without any rules, interested parties are
free to make up and change the rules as they go along) at:
On 6/26/06, Levent <ghastly_fop at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Yes...because this list is not the place for spats or
> personal attacks.
> In the interest of maintaining the list's integrity,
> does anyone else think we could perhaps establish some
> guidelines so that rational, productive discussions
> and dialogues aren't derailed in this way? I think
> that most people on this list, even those who are not
> frequent contributors, appreciate having this forum to
> discuss or simply read other's thoughts about Joe's
> work, and it would be nice if we could all, while
> posting TO the list, maintain positive, polite
> attitudes. If someone does have a personal problem
> with someone else's comments, this list is not the
> place to take it up.
More information about the joe-frank-list