From spblat at gmail.com Tue Apr 5 15:04:37 2005 From: spblat at gmail.com (Will Irace) Date: Tue Apr 5 15:04:41 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] "Bad Faith" - Online March 2005, good show Message-ID: If you haven't checked out "Bad Faith" from the March 2005 section of joefrank.com, go have a listen. Really great stuff. I've placed a writeup and my commentary at http://jfwiki.org/index.php/Bad_Faith . Cheers, --W From harold.johnson at gmail.com Tue Apr 5 23:14:27 2005 From: harold.johnson at gmail.com (Harold Johnson) Date: Tue Apr 5 23:14:35 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] "Bad Faith" - Online March 2005, good show In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2dbaf4d8050405231457c3057a@mail.gmail.com> Hey W, I see you've got a Joe Frank wiki set up there; awesome! Thanks for coming around to let us know. Harold J. Johnson http://audioblogs.info On Apr 5, 2005 3:04 PM, Will Irace wrote: > If you haven't checked out "Bad Faith" from the March 2005 section of > joefrank.com, go have a listen. Really great stuff. I've placed a > writeup and my commentary at http://jfwiki.org/index.php/Bad_Faith . > > Cheers, > > --W > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > From tjh219 at nyu.edu Wed Apr 6 12:18:17 2005 From: tjh219 at nyu.edu (Tayt J Harlin) Date: Wed Apr 6 12:18:23 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe in NY Message-ID: <7e051317e04f09.7e04f097e05131@nyu.edu> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050406/9ef261e5/attachment.htm From bobl at 1amsoftware.com Wed Apr 6 13:59:41 2005 From: bobl at 1amsoftware.com (Bob Lee) Date: Wed Apr 6 13:59:00 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe in NY References: <7e051317e04f09.7e04f097e05131@nyu.edu> Message-ID: <01a301c53aeb$90f5a370$a202a8c0@IBMBOBDESK> I wish ! I hope. Bob Lee ----- Original Message ----- From: Tayt J Harlin To: joe-frank-list@armory.com Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 3:18 PM Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe in NY Anyone know if Joe's planning to do any live shows on the East Coast? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Joe Frank Mailing List joe-frank-list@armory.com http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050406/84b9e20a/attachment.htm From majestic_cheese at yahoo.com Mon Apr 11 19:11:11 2005 From: majestic_cheese at yahoo.com (Larry Dunn) Date: Mon Apr 11 20:01:44 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Kate? Message-ID: <20050412021111.39712.qmail@web30013.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Hello, I'm new to this list. I listened to the Karma series a month or so ago, and I remain intensely curious as to who "Kate" was. Any ideas? I do get the feeling that was at least based on an actual relationship. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ From bobl at 1amsoftware.com Tue Apr 12 17:23:41 2005 From: bobl at 1amsoftware.com (Bob Lee) Date: Tue Apr 12 17:25:06 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe needs our help. Message-ID: <00aa01c53fbf$0c5556f0$d21efea9@IBMBOBSX30> It saddens my heart to report but I heard this evening from a reliable source that Joe is not doing well and could use a few words of kindness from each of us, his supporters, his loyal fans,long time admirers, and friends from afar. The exact nature of the illness or troubles I am not privy to. I can say for certain that every card and letter will be read by or to Joe. Cards can be sent to : Joe Frank PO Box 491027 Los Angeles, CA 90049 ?.... bobl@1amsoftware.com Bob Lee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050412/ee2ed741/attachment.htm From marek at telgarsky.com Thu Apr 14 11:32:44 2005 From: marek at telgarsky.com (Marek Telgarsky) Date: Thu Apr 14 11:32:49 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 4 In-Reply-To: <200504131200.ac24514@deepthought.armory.com> References: <200504131200.ac24514@deepthought.armory.com> Message-ID: <200504141432.44544.marek@telgarsky.com> This is kinda funny, actually. "Joe Frank not doing well." What a suprise, he's always so cheery. Marek On Wednesday 13 April 2005 15:02, joe-frank-list-request@armory.com wrote: > Send joe-frank-list mailing list submissions to > joe-frank-list@armory.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > joe-frank-list-request@armory.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > joe-frank-list-owner@armory.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of joe-frank-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Joe needs our help. (Bob Lee) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:23:41 -0400 > From: "Bob Lee" > Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe needs our help. > To: > Message-ID: <00aa01c53fbf$0c5556f0$d21efea9@IBMBOBSX30> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > It saddens my heart to report but I heard this evening from a reliable > source that Joe is not doing well and could use a few words of kindness > from each of us, his supporters, his loyal fans,long time admirers, and > friends from afar. The exact nature of the illness or troubles I am not > privy to. > > I can say for certain that every card and letter will be read by or to Joe. > > > Cards can be sent to : > > Joe Frank > PO Box 491027 > Los Angeles, CA 90049 > > > ?.... > bobl@1amsoftware.com > Bob Lee > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050412/ee2ed74 >1/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > End of joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 4 > ********************************************* From tkelm94520 at yahoo.com Thu Apr 14 11:51:17 2005 From: tkelm94520 at yahoo.com (Tim) Date: Thu Apr 14 11:52:50 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] THE MAN IS F*KING DYING!! whats so funny about that!??!?!!? In-Reply-To: 6667 Message-ID: <20050414185117.32780.qmail@web50202.mail.yahoo.com> see subject Marek Telgarsky wrote:This is kinda funny, actually. "Joe Frank not doing well." What a suprise, he's always so cheery. Marek On Wednesday 13 April 2005 15:02, joe-frank-list-request@armory.com wrote: > Send joe-frank-list mailing list submissions to > joe-frank-list@armory.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > joe-frank-list-request@armory.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > joe-frank-list-owner@armory.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of joe-frank-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Joe needs our help. (Bob Lee) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:23:41 -0400 > From: "Bob Lee" > Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe needs our help. > To: > Message-ID: <00aa01c53fbf$0c5556f0$d21efea9@IBMBOBSX30> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > It saddens my heart to report but I heard this evening from a reliable > source that Joe is not doing well and could use a few words of kindness > from each of us, his supporters, his loyal fans,long time admirers, and > friends from afar. The exact nature of the illness or troubles I am not > privy to. > > I can say for certain that every card and letter will be read by or to Joe. > > > Cards can be sent to : > > Joe Frank > PO Box 491027 > Los Angeles, CA 90049 > > > ß.... > bobl@1amsoftware.com > Bob Lee > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050412/ee2ed74 >1/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > End of joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 4 > ********************************************* _______________________________________________ Joe Frank Mailing List joe-frank-list@armory.com http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050414/7454fd15/attachment.htm From harold.johnson at gmail.com Thu Apr 14 12:09:53 2005 From: harold.johnson at gmail.com (Harold Johnson) Date: Thu Apr 14 12:09:57 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] THE MAN IS F*KING DYING!! whats so funny about that!??!?!!? In-Reply-To: <20050414185117.32780.qmail@web50202.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050414185117.32780.qmail@web50202.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2dbaf4d805041412094b13581b@mail.gmail.com> Whoa now--come on, guys, nobody said anything like that. Who knows what's really going on? By listening to shows like Terminal, we've come to know that Joe has had some health issues in the past, but Bob's message isn't implying that the man is gravely ill. I sure hope not, but let's send him some care packages anyway. I'm going to listen to the most recent shows at JoeFrank.com now to see what I've missed this past month... Harold J. Johnson http://SomethingthatHappened.com On 4/14/05, Tim wrote: > see subject > > Marek Telgarsky wrote: > This is kinda funny, actually. > > "Joe Frank not doing well." > > What a suprise, he's always so cheery. > > Marek > > > On Wednesday 13 April 2005 15:02, > joe-frank-list-request@armory.com wrote: > > Send joe-frank-list mailing list submissions to > > joe-frank-list@armory.com > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > joe-frank-list-request@armory.com > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > joe-frank-list-owner@armory.com > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of joe-frank-list digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. Joe needs our help. (Bob Lee) > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:23:41 -0400 > > From: "Bob Lee" > > Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe needs our help. > > To: > > Message-ID: <00aa01c53fbf$0c5556f0$d21efea9@IBMBOBSX30> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > It saddens my heart to report but I heard this evening from a reliable > > source that Joe is not doing well and could use a few words of kindness > > from each of us, his supporters, his loyal fans,long time admirers, and > > friends from afar. The exact nature of the illness or troubles I am not > > privy to. > > > > I can say for certain that every card and letter will be read by or to > Joe. > > > > > > Cards can be sent to : > > > > Joe Frank > > PO Box 491027 > > Los Angeles, CA 90049 > > > > > > ?.... > > bobl@1amsoftware.com > > Bob Lee > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: > > > http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050412/ee2ed74 > >1/attachment-0001.htm > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Joe Frank Mailing List > > joe-frank-list@armory.com > > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > > > > End of joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 4 > > ********************************************* > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > ________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! > > > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > From LBlockD at aol.com Thu Apr 14 12:28:26 2005 From: LBlockD at aol.com (LBlockD@aol.com) Date: Thu Apr 14 12:28:34 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] A message from Larry Block Message-ID: <27.703caf95.2f901e5a@aol.com> First of all: Joe is not "f**king d*y*n**g," as Bob Lee puts it so gently, and Marek can note the apparent irony of his in-disposition without being brutalized by Lee in his really disgusting way. Joe will be home soon and, ofcourse, would appreciate cards and letters. But no black roses, Bob Lee. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050414/d7ee2ce8/attachment.htm From harold.johnson at gmail.com Thu Apr 14 12:43:10 2005 From: harold.johnson at gmail.com (Harold Johnson) Date: Thu Apr 14 12:43:14 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] A message from Larry Block In-Reply-To: <27.703caf95.2f901e5a@aol.com> References: <27.703caf95.2f901e5a@aol.com> Message-ID: <2dbaf4d805041412435820c965@mail.gmail.com> Thanks for clarifying for us, Larry. (Love your work, by the way--or your life, or however you wish to refer to it. Life's work?) By the way, I'm not certain it was Bob who expressed Joe's illness so provocatively; I believe it was Marek. In any case, please give Joe our blessings. Harold J. Johnson http://SomethingthatHappened.com On 4/14/05, LBlockD@aol.com wrote: > > First of all: Joe is not "f**king d*y*n**g," as Bob Lee puts it so gently, > and Marek can note the apparent irony of his in-disposition without being > brutalized by Lee in his really disgusting way. Joe will be home soon and, > ofcourse, would appreciate cards and letters. But no black roses, Bob Lee. > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > From eric at megacyberworld.com Thu Apr 14 13:12:17 2005 From: eric at megacyberworld.com (Eric Donaldson) Date: Thu Apr 14 13:08:54 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] A message from Larry Block In-Reply-To: <27.703caf95.2f901e5a@aol.com> References: <27.703caf95.2f901e5a@aol.com> Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.0.20050414150956.025ee5c0@mail.vertigotheatrefactory.org> Yeah, I don't think it was Bob that said that. I'll be working on a note for Joe this afternoon and of course hope he gets well soon. Thanks for the info. - Eric Donaldson At 02:28 PM 4/14/2005, you wrote: >First of all: Joe is not "f**king d*y*n**g," as Bob Lee puts it so >gently, and Marek can note the apparent irony of his in-disposition >without being brutalized by Lee in his really disgusting way. Joe will be >home soon and, ofcourse, would appreciate cards and letters. But no black >roses, Bob Lee. From LBlockD at aol.com Thu Apr 14 13:30:27 2005 From: LBlockD at aol.com (LBlockD@aol.com) Date: Thu Apr 14 13:30:37 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 5/ From Larry Block Message-ID: <6.42fb83dc.2f902ce3@aol.com> My sincere apology to Bob Lee, who I MISTAKENLY thought had uttered the "f**king d**ng" epithet, which I now know was gifted to us by a clown named Tim. Bob Lee is a great man and a great and loyal fan and for me to even for a moment impune his loyalty and integrity was a terrible thing. Larry Block -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050414/08be2f4c/attachment.htm From harold.johnson at gmail.com Thu Apr 14 13:48:24 2005 From: harold.johnson at gmail.com (Harold Johnson) Date: Thu Apr 14 13:48:29 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 5/ From Larry Block In-Reply-To: <6.42fb83dc.2f902ce3@aol.com> References: <6.42fb83dc.2f902ce3@aol.com> Message-ID: <2dbaf4d80504141348979ce43@mail.gmail.com> Larry, you are seriously a bastard. (Also a poet and a scholar, but that's another story...) Just kidding, of course. (Not about the poet thing, though). Harold J. Johnson http://SomethingthatHappened.com On 4/14/05, LBlockD@aol.com wrote: > > My sincere apology to Bob Lee, who I MISTAKENLY thought had uttered the > "f**king d**ng" epithet, which I now know was gifted to us by a clown named > Tim. Bob Lee is a great man and a great and loyal fan and for me to even for > a moment impune his loyalty and integrity was a terrible thing. Larry Block > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > From Peisithanatos at aol.com Thu Apr 14 17:03:31 2005 From: Peisithanatos at aol.com (Peisithanatos@aol.com) Date: Thu Apr 14 17:03:45 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe needs our help. Message-ID: <9e.248aabc9.2f905ed3@aol.com> Joe Frank will never die. Of course, one day (many, many years from now, Allah willing), he will depart this mortal realm, in a physical sense... as will we all. But the Soul of Joe Frank will live on forever.... For now, he has the prayers and well-wishes of the legions of people he's touched over the years to help him through whatever hurdles he's being confronted with. Never underestimate the power of positive thinking, or the impact it can have on those in need! Grandiniamo Joe Frank L'immortale! Hegesias -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050414/e86970a8/attachment.htm From majestic_cheese at yahoo.com Thu Apr 14 19:45:37 2005 From: majestic_cheese at yahoo.com (Larry Dunn) Date: Thu Apr 14 19:47:09 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Re: THE MAN IS F*KING DYING!! In-Reply-To: <200504141201.ac04559@deepthought.armory.com> Message-ID: <20050415024537.83272.qmail@web30008.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Tim wrote: >THE MAN IS F*KING DYING!! >whats so funny > about that!??!?!!? Wait a minute. Is that confirmed? If so, that is horrible news, worse than I'd thought. Can someone confirm that? (By the way, not that this is important concerning the topic of the message, but you guys REALLY need to learn how to trim your messages.) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ From uhohjf at yahoo.com Fri Apr 15 00:15:17 2005 From: uhohjf at yahoo.com (Bob deux) Date: Fri Apr 15 00:16:53 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe Frank appreciation voicemail 1-888-220-7523 Message-ID: <20050415071517.79796.qmail@web31911.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Dear loyal and new listeners of Joe Frank, I have been meaning to create something like this for quite a very long time, and it would seem very appropriate to get it started immediately now. I have set up an 888 voicemail number with unlimited minutes for listeners to call and leave messages/anecdotes along the lines of: -how Joe's program has touched your life, good or bad -how you've come to hear of Joe's work -how Joe has created some meaning or void in your life -etc etc, though any comments/ponderings are welcome My goal was and still is to compile these and mix them with Joe's droning ambience muse and make it freely available to both Joe and fans, with the sole purpose of showing how much Joe has indeed influenced our lives-- good and bad. In light of recent news, there is also an option to choose for those who would like to leave a get well message for Joe. These specific messages will be forwarded to the Joe Frank team of www.joefrank.com and therefore be made available to Joe himself. This is not to detract from cards or letters you plan on sending to him, but to add another format of communication, a format we are all too familiar with from his shows. And who knows, maybe it is cathartic to light a match and watch and smell the flames engulf the letters in a studio. So feel free to call 24/7: 1-888-220-7523* Bob deux *Note: This is created by me, a long time listener of Joe Frank. I am not affiliated with him or www.joefrank.com in any other way, shape, or form. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ From eric at megacyberworld.com Fri Apr 15 01:32:20 2005 From: eric at megacyberworld.com (Eric Donaldson) Date: Fri Apr 15 01:28:43 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe Frank appreciation voicemail 1-888-220-7523 In-Reply-To: <20050415071517.79796.qmail@web31911.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20050415071517.79796.qmail@web31911.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.0.20050415033107.0266aab8@mail.megacyberworld.com> Just left a rambling message to Joe. I hope he hears it. Thanks a lot! - Eric Donaldson At 02:15 AM 4/15/2005, you wrote: >So feel free to call 24/7: 1-888-220-7523* > >Bob deux From harold.johnson at gmail.com Fri Apr 15 07:46:46 2005 From: harold.johnson at gmail.com (Harold Johnson) Date: Fri Apr 15 07:46:54 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe Frank appreciation voicemail 1-888-220-7523 In-Reply-To: <20050415071517.79796.qmail@web31911.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20050415071517.79796.qmail@web31911.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2dbaf4d8050415074665594012@mail.gmail.com> This is a fantastic idea, Bob. I'll be calling in to leave a message soon. Harold J. Johnson SomethingthatHappened.com On 4/15/05, Bob deux wrote: > > Dear loyal and new listeners of Joe Frank, > > I have been meaning to create something like this for quite a very long time, > and it would seem very appropriate to get it started immediately now. > > I have set up an 888 voicemail number with unlimited minutes for listeners to > call and leave messages/anecdotes along the lines of: > > -how Joe's program has touched your life, good or bad > -how you've come to hear of Joe's work > -how Joe has created some meaning or void in your life > -etc etc, though any comments/ponderings are welcome > > My goal was and still is to compile these and mix them with Joe's droning > ambience muse and make it freely available to both Joe and fans, with the sole > purpose of showing how much Joe has indeed influenced our lives-- good and bad. > > In light of recent news, there is also an option to choose for those who would > like to leave a get well message for Joe. These specific messages will be > forwarded to the Joe Frank team of www.joefrank.com and therefore be made > available to Joe himself. > > This is not to detract from cards or letters you plan on sending to him, but to > add another format of communication, a format we are all too familiar with from > his shows. And who knows, maybe it is cathartic to light a match and watch and > smell the flames engulf the letters in a studio. > > So feel free to call 24/7: 1-888-220-7523* > > Bob deux > > *Note: This is created by me, a long time listener of Joe Frank. I am not > affiliated with him or www.joefrank.com in any other way, shape, or form. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > From bobl at 1amsoftware.com Fri Apr 15 08:57:33 2005 From: bobl at 1amsoftware.com (Bob Lee) Date: Fri Apr 15 08:59:19 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe Frank appreciation voicemail 1-888-220-7523 References: <20050415071517.79796.qmail@web31911.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <014601c541d3$d637c050$a202a8c0@IBMBOBDESK> Great idea. Thanks for setting it up. Bob Lee From bluenile at sbcglobal.net Fri Apr 15 09:42:06 2005 From: bluenile at sbcglobal.net (Phares Gonzales) Date: Fri Apr 15 09:43:05 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] RE: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 6 In-Reply-To: <200504150748.ab14749@deepthought.armory.com> Message-ID: <200504150943.aa00974@deepthought.armory.com> How does that saying go? F*** 'em if they can't take a joke!!?? -----Original Message----- From: joe-frank-list-bounces@armory.com [mailto:joe-frank-list-bounces@armory.com] On Behalf Of joe-frank-list-request@armory.com Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 7:48 AM To: joe-frank-list@armory.com Subject: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 6 Send joe-frank-list mailing list submissions to joe-frank-list@armory.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to joe-frank-list-request@armory.com You can reach the person managing the list at joe-frank-list-owner@armory.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of joe-frank-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: THE MAN IS F*KING DYING!! whats so funny about that!??!?!!? (Harold Johnson) 2. A message from Larry Block (LBlockD@aol.com) 3. Re: A message from Larry Block (Harold Johnson) 4. Re: A message from Larry Block (Eric Donaldson) 5. Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 5/ From Larry Block (LBlockD@aol.com) 6. Re: Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 5/ From Larry Block (Harold Johnson) 7. Re: Joe needs our help. (Peisithanatos@aol.com) 8. Re: THE MAN IS F*KING DYING!! (Larry Dunn) 9. Joe Frank appreciation voicemail 1-888-220-7523 (Bob deux) 10. Re: Joe Frank appreciation voicemail 1-888-220-7523 (Eric Donaldson) 11. Re: Joe Frank appreciation voicemail 1-888-220-7523 (Harold Johnson) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:09:53 -0700 From: Harold Johnson Subject: Re: [joe-frank-list] THE MAN IS F*KING DYING!! whats so funny about that!??!?!!? To: Joe Frank Mailing List Message-ID: <2dbaf4d805041412094b13581b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Whoa now--come on, guys, nobody said anything like that. Who knows what's really going on? By listening to shows like Terminal, we've come to know that Joe has had some health issues in the past, but Bob's message isn't implying that the man is gravely ill. I sure hope not, but let's send him some care packages anyway. I'm going to listen to the most recent shows at JoeFrank.com now to see what I've missed this past month... Harold J. Johnson http://SomethingthatHappened.com On 4/14/05, Tim wrote: > see subject > > Marek Telgarsky wrote: > This is kinda funny, actually. > > "Joe Frank not doing well." > > What a suprise, he's always so cheery. > > Marek > > > On Wednesday 13 April 2005 15:02, > joe-frank-list-request@armory.com wrote: > > Send joe-frank-list mailing list submissions to > > joe-frank-list@armory.com > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > joe-frank-list-request@armory.com > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > joe-frank-list-owner@armory.com > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of joe-frank-list digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. Joe needs our help. (Bob Lee) > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:23:41 -0400 > > From: "Bob Lee" > > Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe needs our help. > > To: > > Message-ID: <00aa01c53fbf$0c5556f0$d21efea9@IBMBOBSX30> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > It saddens my heart to report but I heard this evening from a reliable > > source that Joe is not doing well and could use a few words of kindness > > from each of us, his supporters, his loyal fans,long time admirers, and > > friends from afar. The exact nature of the illness or troubles I am not > > privy to. > > > > I can say for certain that every card and letter will be read by or to > Joe. > > > > > > Cards can be sent to : > > > > Joe Frank > > PO Box 491027 > > Los Angeles, CA 90049 > > > > > > _.... > > bobl@1amsoftware.com > > Bob Lee > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: > > > http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050412/ee2ed74 > >1/attachment-0001.htm > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Joe Frank Mailing List > > joe-frank-list@armory.com > > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > > > > End of joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 4 > > ********************************************* > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > ________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! > > > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:28:26 EDT From: LBlockD@aol.com Subject: [joe-frank-list] A message from Larry Block To: joe-frank-list@armory.com Message-ID: <27.703caf95.2f901e5a@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" First of all: Joe is not "f**king d*y*n**g," as Bob Lee puts it so gently, and Marek can note the apparent irony of his in-disposition without being brutalized by Lee in his really disgusting way. Joe will be home soon and, ofcourse, would appreciate cards and letters. But no black roses, Bob Lee. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050414/d7ee2ce8 /attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:43:10 -0700 From: Harold Johnson Subject: Re: [joe-frank-list] A message from Larry Block To: Joe Frank Mailing List Message-ID: <2dbaf4d805041412435820c965@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for clarifying for us, Larry. (Love your work, by the way--or your life, or however you wish to refer to it. Life's work?) By the way, I'm not certain it was Bob who expressed Joe's illness so provocatively; I believe it was Marek. In any case, please give Joe our blessings. Harold J. Johnson http://SomethingthatHappened.com On 4/14/05, LBlockD@aol.com wrote: > > First of all: Joe is not "f**king d*y*n**g," as Bob Lee puts it so gently, > and Marek can note the apparent irony of his in-disposition without being > brutalized by Lee in his really disgusting way. Joe will be home soon and, > ofcourse, would appreciate cards and letters. But no black roses, Bob Lee. > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:12:17 -0500 From: Eric Donaldson Subject: Re: [joe-frank-list] A message from Larry Block To: Joe Frank Mailing List Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.0.20050414150956.025ee5c0@mail.vertigotheatrefactory.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Yeah, I don't think it was Bob that said that. I'll be working on a note for Joe this afternoon and of course hope he gets well soon. Thanks for the info. - Eric Donaldson At 02:28 PM 4/14/2005, you wrote: >First of all: Joe is not "f**king d*y*n**g," as Bob Lee puts it so >gently, and Marek can note the apparent irony of his in-disposition >without being brutalized by Lee in his really disgusting way. Joe will be >home soon and, ofcourse, would appreciate cards and letters. But no black >roses, Bob Lee. ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:30:27 EDT From: LBlockD@aol.com Subject: [joe-frank-list] Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 5/ From Larry Block To: joe-frank-list@armory.com Message-ID: <6.42fb83dc.2f902ce3@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" My sincere apology to Bob Lee, who I MISTAKENLY thought had uttered the "f**king d**ng" epithet, which I now know was gifted to us by a clown named Tim. Bob Lee is a great man and a great and loyal fan and for me to even for a moment impune his loyalty and integrity was a terrible thing. Larry Block -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050414/08be2f4c /attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:48:24 -0700 From: Harold Johnson Subject: Re: [joe-frank-list] Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 5/ From Larry Block To: Joe Frank Mailing List Message-ID: <2dbaf4d80504141348979ce43@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Larry, you are seriously a bastard. (Also a poet and a scholar, but that's another story...) Just kidding, of course. (Not about the poet thing, though). Harold J. Johnson http://SomethingthatHappened.com On 4/14/05, LBlockD@aol.com wrote: > > My sincere apology to Bob Lee, who I MISTAKENLY thought had uttered the > "f**king d**ng" epithet, which I now know was gifted to us by a clown named > Tim. Bob Lee is a great man and a great and loyal fan and for me to even for > a moment impune his loyalty and integrity was a terrible thing. Larry Block > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > > ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:03:31 EDT From: Peisithanatos@aol.com Subject: Re: [joe-frank-list] Joe needs our help. To: joe-frank-list@armory.com Message-ID: <9e.248aabc9.2f905ed3@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Joe Frank will never die. Of course, one day (many, many years from now, Allah willing), he will depart this mortal realm, in a physical sense... as will we all. But the Soul of Joe Frank will live on forever.... For now, he has the prayers and well-wishes of the legions of people he's touched over the years to help him through whatever hurdles he's being confronted with. Never underestimate the power of positive thinking, or the impact it can have on those in need! Grandiniamo Joe Frank L'immortale! Hegesias -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050414/e86970a8 /attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:45:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Larry Dunn Subject: [joe-frank-list] Re: THE MAN IS F*KING DYING!! To: joe-frank-list@armory.com Message-ID: <20050415024537.83272.qmail@web30008.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Tim wrote: >THE MAN IS F*KING DYING!! >whats so funny > about that!??!?!!? Wait a minute. Is that confirmed? If so, that is horrible news, worse than I'd thought. Can someone confirm that? (By the way, not that this is important concerning the topic of the message, but you guys REALLY need to learn how to trim your messages.) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:15:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Bob deux Subject: [joe-frank-list] Joe Frank appreciation voicemail 1-888-220-7523 To: joefranklist Message-ID: <20050415071517.79796.qmail@web31911.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear loyal and new listeners of Joe Frank, I have been meaning to create something like this for quite a very long time, and it would seem very appropriate to get it started immediately now. I have set up an 888 voicemail number with unlimited minutes for listeners to call and leave messages/anecdotes along the lines of: -how Joe's program has touched your life, good or bad -how you've come to hear of Joe's work -how Joe has created some meaning or void in your life -etc etc, though any comments/ponderings are welcome My goal was and still is to compile these and mix them with Joe's droning ambience muse and make it freely available to both Joe and fans, with the sole purpose of showing how much Joe has indeed influenced our lives-- good and bad. In light of recent news, there is also an option to choose for those who would like to leave a get well message for Joe. These specific messages will be forwarded to the Joe Frank team of www.joefrank.com and therefore be made available to Joe himself. This is not to detract from cards or letters you plan on sending to him, but to add another format of communication, a format we are all too familiar with from his shows. And who knows, maybe it is cathartic to light a match and watch and smell the flames engulf the letters in a studio. So feel free to call 24/7: 1-888-220-7523* Bob deux *Note: This is created by me, a long time listener of Joe Frank. I am not affiliated with him or www.joefrank.com in any other way, shape, or form. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 03:32:20 -0500 From: Eric Donaldson Subject: Re: [joe-frank-list] Joe Frank appreciation voicemail 1-888-220-7523 To: Joe Frank Mailing List Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.0.20050415033107.0266aab8@mail.megacyberworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Just left a rambling message to Joe. I hope he hears it. Thanks a lot! - Eric Donaldson At 02:15 AM 4/15/2005, you wrote: >So feel free to call 24/7: 1-888-220-7523* > >Bob deux ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:46:46 -0700 From: Harold Johnson Subject: Re: [joe-frank-list] Joe Frank appreciation voicemail 1-888-220-7523 To: Joe Frank Mailing List Message-ID: <2dbaf4d8050415074665594012@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This is a fantastic idea, Bob. I'll be calling in to leave a message soon. Harold J. Johnson SomethingthatHappened.com On 4/15/05, Bob deux wrote: > > Dear loyal and new listeners of Joe Frank, > > I have been meaning to create something like this for quite a very long time, > and it would seem very appropriate to get it started immediately now. > > I have set up an 888 voicemail number with unlimited minutes for listeners to > call and leave messages/anecdotes along the lines of: > > -how Joe's program has touched your life, good or bad > -how you've come to hear of Joe's work > -how Joe has created some meaning or void in your life > -etc etc, though any comments/ponderings are welcome > > My goal was and still is to compile these and mix them with Joe's droning > ambience muse and make it freely available to both Joe and fans, with the sole > purpose of showing how much Joe has indeed influenced our lives-- good and bad. > > In light of recent news, there is also an option to choose for those who would > like to leave a get well message for Joe. These specific messages will be > forwarded to the Joe Frank team of www.joefrank.com and therefore be made > available to Joe himself. > > This is not to detract from cards or letters you plan on sending to him, but to > add another format of communication, a format we are all too familiar with from > his shows. And who knows, maybe it is cathartic to light a match and watch and > smell the flames engulf the letters in a studio. > > So feel free to call 24/7: 1-888-220-7523* > > Bob deux > > *Note: This is created by me, a long time listener of Joe Frank. I am not > affiliated with him or www.joefrank.com in any other way, shape, or form. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Joe Frank Mailing List joe-frank-list@armory.com http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list End of joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 6 ********************************************* From bluenile at sbcglobal.net Fri Apr 15 13:58:39 2005 From: bluenile at sbcglobal.net (Phares Gonzales) Date: Fri Apr 15 13:59:37 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] F*** 'em if they can take a joke!!! In-Reply-To: <200504151200.ab23451@deepthought.armory.com> Message-ID: <200504151359.aa04472@deepthought.armory.com> From lovesick_alien at comcast.net Fri Apr 15 17:20:00 2005 From: lovesick_alien at comcast.net (lovesick_alien) Date: Fri Apr 15 17:21:33 2005 Subject: C'mon folks - trim your posts and adjust your subjects. Sheesh! ! Was [RE: [joe-frank-list] RE: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 6] In-Reply-To: <200504150943.aa00974@deepthought.armory.com> Message-ID: <000001c5421a$0a205080$9ea6b042@lovesickalien> SSIA, just about: Phares sends us the entire digest to remark: > How does that saying go? F*** 'em if they can't take a joke!!?? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.11 - Release Date: 4/14/2005 From rholland356 at yahoo.com Fri Apr 15 23:49:32 2005 From: rholland356 at yahoo.com (Robert Holland) Date: Fri Apr 15 23:51:04 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] A message from Larry Block In-Reply-To: 6667 Message-ID: <20050416064932.83014.qmail@web13826.mail.yahoo.com> Writing a note to Joe Frank is an interesting exercise--do you try to entertain him? What could you write that would possibly be of interest? I get the feeling he wouldn't find generic fanboy drivel to be worth his time. Do you share a story with him? Send him the latest email jokes? I think writing to Joe Frank would be extremely difficult. It might be best to send him a bottle of his favorite spirits (hey, fans, what would that be?). Although, that could get you in dutch with homeland security. No, I'd prefer to write to Larry Block. I think that would be fun, 'cuz that Larry's one crazy m*t*er**ck*r**ng guy. Robert Holland --- Eric Donaldson wrote: > ... I'll > be working on a note > for Joe this afternoon and of course hope he gets > well soon. Thanks for > the info. > > - Eric Donaldson __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail From harold.johnson at gmail.com Sun Apr 17 10:41:36 2005 From: harold.johnson at gmail.com (Harold Johnson) Date: Sun Apr 17 10:41:39 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] How many of us have weblogs? In-Reply-To: <20050416064932.83014.qmail@web13826.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050416064932.83014.qmail@web13826.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2dbaf4d8050417104176536d88@mail.gmail.com> Hi everyone, How many of us here have weblogs? I was thinking--any of us with blogs could post some of our Joe Frank experiences and that way share our favorite artist with all the folks who haven't yet discovered his work. Maybe we can even start a collaborative blog using a free tool like Blogger (at blogger.com ). Harold J. Johnson http://SomethingthatHappened.com From LBlockD at aol.com Sun Apr 17 17:34:04 2005 From: LBlockD at aol.com (LBlockD@aol.com) Date: Sun Apr 17 17:34:20 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 8 Message-ID: <143.437244c5.2f945a7c@aol.com> Re: Robert Holland's posting. Joe's favorite spirit - other than mine - is Grey Goose vodka; though he would never trust a bottle that I had not personally - and exhaustively - sampled. A generous thought , Robert Holland, though I'm a lot less crazy than you might think. Larry Block -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050417/ab6fc9c2/attachment.htm From majestic_cheese at yahoo.com Sun Apr 17 17:35:21 2005 From: majestic_cheese at yahoo.com (Larry Dunn) Date: Sun Apr 17 17:36:54 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] A message from Larry Block In-Reply-To: <200504171200.ac21031@deepthought.armory.com> Message-ID: <20050418003521.67898.qmail@web30005.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Robert Holland >I get the feeling he wouldn't find generic fanboy >drivel to be worth his time. No, but I understand that he finds individually-crafted fanboy drivel to be greatly worthy of his time. >Do you share a story with him? Send him the latest email jokes? >I think writing to Joe Frank would be extremely >difficult. Since he's not feeling well and we have had it suggested that he would enjoy hearing from us, I'd suggest something along these lines: Hi Joe, it's me, Schmedrick (substitute own name). I've heard you're not feeling well, and so I wanted to take some time to tell you that I was very sorry to hear that, and I'm hoping you feel better soon. I really enjoy your radio programs; in fact, they've meant a lot to me over the years. All the best, Schmedrick (substitute own name). Hope this helps, Larry __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides! http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide From spblat at gmail.com Sun Apr 17 19:21:53 2005 From: spblat at gmail.com (Will Irace) Date: Sun Apr 17 19:21:57 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] How many of us have weblogs? In-Reply-To: <2dbaf4d8050417104176536d88@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050416064932.83014.qmail@web13826.mail.yahoo.com> <2dbaf4d8050417104176536d88@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I blogged about Joe last October: http://www.irace.net/mt/archives/000147.html Since then, all my personal opinions and feelings about Joe's work are funneling into the wiki: http://jfwiki.org/index.php/User:Spblat --W From LBlockD at aol.com Mon Apr 18 04:59:19 2005 From: LBlockD at aol.com (LBlockD@aol.com) Date: Mon Apr 18 04:59:24 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Re: joe-frank-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 8 Message-ID: <1ea.3aea5c44.2f94fb17@aol.com> Correction: I have been informed by certain juice-heads who are in a position to know - mainly prone on the sidewalk in front of The Praxis Package store in Santa Monica - that Joe's favorite booze is Belvedere Vodka, not the more pedestrian Gray Goose. Just to keep the legend straight. Larry Block -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.armory.com/pipermail/joe-frank-list/attachments/20050418/d04ff1d4/attachment.htm From turbocrazed at yahoo.com Sun Apr 24 11:38:40 2005 From: turbocrazed at yahoo.com (David Smith) Date: Sun Apr 24 11:40:13 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] I've Missed Something Message-ID: <20050424183840.32162.qmail@web50004.mail.yahoo.com> O.K. so, Joe is sick. Some want to send "get well" offerings like Vodka or cards. However, where to send? Before you could always send to Joe Frank: care of KCRW, or at least that is where I sent stuff (my checks always got cashed anyway). Now where? Do we even have a hospital to send to? Or do we just send everything (money, booze, drugs, etc.) to Mr. Block? David S. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From bobl at 1amsoftware.com Sun Apr 24 11:55:51 2005 From: bobl at 1amsoftware.com (Bob Lee) Date: Sun Apr 24 11:57:27 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] I've Missed Something References: <20050424183840.32162.qmail@web50004.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <002b01c548ff$4405ac50$8112060a@BOBST30> Send cards letters /booze (if you want) , cash, you name it. to: Joe Frank PO Box 491027 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Bob Lee . Now where? Do we > even have a hospital to send to? Or do we just send > everything (money, booze, drugs, etc.) to Mr. Block? > > David S. From kensey99 at aol.com Sat Apr 30 16:10:03 2005 From: kensey99 at aol.com (kensey99@aol.com) Date: Sat Apr 30 16:10:09 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Kate? In-Reply-To: <20050412021111.39712.qmail@web30013.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20050412021111.39712.qmail@web30013.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <8C71BF0E02505E3-B4C-24EDB@mblk-r24.sysops.aol.com> While volunteering for KCRW, I once asked Joe this exact question. His answer was "yes," but wouldn't tell me who. -----Original Message----- From: Larry Dunn To: joe-frank-list@armory.com Sent: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [joe-frank-list] Kate? Hello, I'm new to this list. I listened to the Karma series a month or so ago, and I remain intensely curious as to who "Kate" was. Any ideas? I do get the feeling that was at least based on an actual relationship. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ _______________________________________________ Joe Frank Mailing List joe-frank-list@armory.com http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list From steve at theavocadopapers.com Sat Apr 30 17:07:11 2005 From: steve at theavocadopapers.com (Steve Schneider) Date: Sat Apr 30 17:47:47 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Kate? In-Reply-To: <8C71BF0E02505E3-B4C-24EDB@mblk-r24.sysops.aol.com> Message-ID: <003301c54de1$b989e6d0$6b00a8c0@AVOCADO2> Never posted to this list before, although I've been following it for a while. I saw Larry Dunn's post a few weeks ago, and noticed the lack of response, or even comment, which led me to believe that the "who is Kate" topic is somehow taboo on this list, and/or among Joe Frank fans. But I'm not sure why it should be (perhaps it isn't). One might argue that "we must respect Joe's privacy," but nobody's talking about disrespecting anyone's privacy; surely J.F. (sorry, not comfortable referring to him as "Joe") knew that there would be speculation as to "Kate's" identity when he did the Karma shows. If he were truly and completely committed to keeping her identity a secret, he probably wouldn't have produced a dozen or so shows centered on her. (I don't mean to imply that by doing she shows, he intended to reveal her identity; just that the possibility of her identity being revealed surely crossed his mind as a "risk".) Anyway, I hope that this seems like a legitimate topic for discussion on this list; if someone writes a biography of J.F. at some point, this will, I'd imagine, be a point of speculation, and with good reason: understanding "who someone is" (presumably the purpose of writing a biography, and one of the purposes of being a member of a list like this) -- the "someone" here being J.F. -- is often furthered by knowing whom they choose to have relationships with. (Or maybe I'm a blasphemer for broaching the topic; if so, fine; J.F. is a great "blasphemer," so I'm in good company.) At any rate, I have, frankly, scoured the web looking for an answer to this Kate question and found absolutely nothing (including, even, any speculation, including on this list). My thoughts on this topic (which really isn't important; then again, I can't imagine that anyone on this list hasn't at least idly wondered about it) are: 1) My guess is that Kate isn't actually Welsh. Wales is not a large place, and it seems to me that if Kate were actually Welsh, then revealing that about her would be a "dead giveaway". (If she WERE Welsh, then Catharine Zeta-Jones would fit the description nicely -- except perhaps with regard to her age; see below about that -- but then "Kate" would be a truly poor attempt at hiding her identity.) My guess is that "Welsh" is a stand-in for, what: English? Scottish? Irish? Who knows. 2) Timing: these shows were produced in 1999 and 2000, I believe? If so, Kate is someone (if we are to go on the facts as relayed by J.F., which of course may be a big mistake) whose career was taking off around that time: she received $400,000 to star in (or play a large role in) a "police drama" around that time, one filmed in Italy. 400 grand is not a HUGE sum to be paid for being in a movie, but someone who's getting paid that amount is probably someone people have heard of. (Note: perhaps her career never "took off"; perhaps someone made a bad 400-grand gamble.) 3) Age. I'm confused about this one. There's discussion in one of the Karma shows about Kate mentioning that "younger lovers" are superior lovers; how old do you have to be to have a "younger lover"? Theoretically, of course, any age; realistically, though: what, 30s? As for an "upper limit" on her age, I don't have one -- I'd note, though, that someone in their 50s probably isn't being paid $400,000 for her first major film. I can't remember if there's any discussion of Kate wanting children or not; that would provide a clue as well. 4) Physical attributes: tall, beautiful, magnetic, striking. Dark-haired, I think, although maybe I'm just getting that from the fact that I have visually cast C. Zeta-Jones in the role of Kate; I admit it. Or perhaps I'm being way too literal here -- perhaps Kate is a short, fat Vietnamese woman in her seventies who get paid not $400,000 but $400, and not to star in a film but to be an extra in one. Thoughts? I'm hoping that this is a Joe Frank discussion list as opposed to a Joe Frank reverence/worship club; if it's the latter, this post won't be popular and I promise to leave the church immediately. -- Steve. -----Original Message----- From: joe-frank-list-bounces@armory.com [mailto:joe-frank-list-bounces@armory.com] On Behalf Of kensey99@aol.com Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 7:10 PM To: joe-frank-list@armory.com Subject: Re: [joe-frank-list] Kate? Importance: Low While volunteering for KCRW, I once asked Joe this exact question. His answer was "yes," but wouldn't tell me who. -----Original Message----- From: Larry Dunn To: joe-frank-list@armory.com Sent: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [joe-frank-list] Kate? Hello, I'm new to this list. I listened to the Karma series a month or so ago, and I remain intensely curious as to who "Kate" was. Any ideas? I do get the feeling that was at least based on an actual relationship. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ _______________________________________________ Joe Frank Mailing List joe-frank-list@armory.com http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list _______________________________________________ Joe Frank Mailing List joe-frank-list@armory.com http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list From harold.johnson at gmail.com Sat Apr 30 18:24:50 2005 From: harold.johnson at gmail.com (Harold Johnson) Date: Sat Apr 30 18:24:54 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] Kate? In-Reply-To: <003301c54de1$b989e6d0$6b00a8c0@AVOCADO2> References: <8C71BF0E02505E3-B4C-24EDB@mblk-r24.sysops.aol.com> <003301c54de1$b989e6d0$6b00a8c0@AVOCADO2> Message-ID: <2dbaf4d80504301824ac49f5b@mail.gmail.com> Hi Steve, I haven't posted to this group a whole lot either, though I've been watching it off and on for a few years. I'm glad to see you've posted, especially since you seem to have taken the time to post a well-thought, intelligent and considerate post. So here's my thoughts: I don't believe there are any particular rules here; I would expect the common sense protocols common on many online forums. In other words, respect your neighbor, etc. Though I'd imagine many of us hold Joe Frank - or at the very least, his art - at high esteem, but I'm not about to say I worship him (yet; though if he starts a religion, I don't know, LOL). I find it funny that you say you're not quite comfortable referring to him as "Joe" yet; I've often had the same feeling. When I refer to him here or on one of my blogs - let's say I'm writing some commentary about storytelling artists or something - I'm inclined to refer to the man by his full name, too. I believe it's because I don't wish to be perceived as one of those nutjobs who talks about a celebrity/artist/whomever as if they *really* know her. (I'm not referring to any of you posting to this list - except for you, of course, Larry Block. That's a joke, LOL.) Example: Following is a link to some commentary I recently posted in which I mentioned Joe Frank; you'll, however, that I *crossed the line* and referred to him by his forename: http://www.somethingthathappened.com/2005/04/hi-reed-i-want-to-express-to-you-how.html That's all I have to say for now. I'm off to watch an episode of Deadwood I picked up at Goodwill; I hear this show's pretty decent. Harold J. Johnson On 4/30/05, Steve Schneider wrote: > Never posted to this list before, although I've been following it for a > while. I saw Larry Dunn's post a few weeks ago, and noticed the lack of > response, or even comment, which led me to believe that the "who is > Kate" topic is somehow taboo on this list, and/or among Joe Frank fans. > But I'm not sure why it should be (perhaps it isn't). One might argue > that "we must respect Joe's privacy," but nobody's talking about > disrespecting anyone's privacy; surely J.F. (sorry, not comfortable > referring to him as "Joe") knew that there would be speculation as to > "Kate's" identity when he did the Karma shows. If he were truly and > completely committed to keeping her identity a secret, he probably > wouldn't have produced a dozen or so shows centered on her. (I don't > mean to imply that by doing she shows, he intended to reveal her > identity; just that the possibility of her identity being revealed > surely crossed his mind as a "risk".) > > Anyway, I hope that this seems like a legitimate topic for discussion on > this list; if someone writes a biography of J.F. at some point, this > will, I'd imagine, be a point of speculation, and with good reason: > understanding "who someone is" (presumably the purpose of writing a > biography, and one of the purposes of being a member of a list like > this) -- the "someone" here being J.F. -- is often furthered by knowing > whom they choose to have relationships with. (Or maybe I'm a blasphemer > for broaching the topic; if so, fine; J.F. is a great "blasphemer," so > I'm in good company.) > > At any rate, I have, frankly, scoured the web looking for an answer to > this Kate question and found absolutely nothing (including, even, any > speculation, including on this list). My thoughts on this topic (which > really isn't important; then again, I can't imagine that anyone on this > list hasn't at least idly wondered about it) are: > > 1) My guess is that Kate isn't actually Welsh. Wales is not a large > place, and it seems to me that if Kate were actually Welsh, then > revealing that about her would be a "dead giveaway". (If she WERE > Welsh, then Catharine Zeta-Jones would fit the description nicely -- > except perhaps with regard to her age; see below about that -- but then > "Kate" would be a truly poor attempt at hiding her identity.) My guess > is that "Welsh" is a stand-in for, what: English? Scottish? Irish? > Who knows. > > 2) Timing: these shows were produced in 1999 and 2000, I believe? If > so, Kate is someone (if we are to go on the facts as relayed by J.F., > which of course may be a big mistake) whose career was taking off around > that time: she received $400,000 to star in (or play a large role in) a > "police drama" around that time, one filmed in Italy. 400 grand is not > a HUGE sum to be paid for being in a movie, but someone who's getting > paid that amount is probably someone people have heard of. (Note: > perhaps her career never "took off"; perhaps someone made a bad > 400-grand gamble.) > > 3) Age. I'm confused about this one. There's discussion in one of the > Karma shows about Kate mentioning that "younger lovers" are superior > lovers; how old do you have to be to have a "younger lover"? > Theoretically, of course, any age; realistically, though: what, 30s? As > for an "upper limit" on her age, I don't have one -- I'd note, though, > that someone in their 50s probably isn't being paid $400,000 for her > first major film. I can't remember if there's any discussion of Kate > wanting children or not; that would provide a clue as well. > > 4) Physical attributes: tall, beautiful, magnetic, striking. > Dark-haired, I think, although maybe I'm just getting that from the fact > that I have visually cast C. Zeta-Jones in the role of Kate; I admit it. > > Or perhaps I'm being way too literal here -- perhaps Kate is a short, > fat Vietnamese woman in her seventies who get paid not $400,000 but > $400, and not to star in a film but to be an extra in one. > > Thoughts? I'm hoping that this is a Joe Frank discussion list as > opposed to a Joe Frank reverence/worship club; if it's the latter, this > post won't be popular and I promise to leave the church immediately. > > -- Steve. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: joe-frank-list-bounces@armory.com > [mailto:joe-frank-list-bounces@armory.com] On Behalf Of kensey99@aol.com > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 7:10 PM > To: joe-frank-list@armory.com > Subject: Re: [joe-frank-list] Kate? > Importance: Low > > While volunteering for KCRW, I once asked Joe this exact question. His > answer was "yes," but wouldn't tell me who. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Dunn > To: joe-frank-list@armory.com > Sent: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:11:11 -0700 (PDT) > Subject: [joe-frank-list] Kate? > > Hello, I'm new to this list. I listened to the Karma > series a month or so ago, and I remain intensely > curious as to who "Kate" was. Any ideas? I do get > the feeling that was at least based on an actual relationship. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > > _______________________________________________ > Joe Frank Mailing List > joe-frank-list@armory.com > http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list > From harold.johnson at gmail.com Sat Apr 30 20:53:35 2005 From: harold.johnson at gmail.com (Harold Johnson) Date: Sat Apr 30 20:53:39 2005 Subject: [joe-frank-list] New Joe Frank Listener Blogs Impressions Message-ID: <2dbaf4d80504302053193a2686@mail.gmail.com> I just discovered this blogger, Jess, who's a new listener of Joe Frank. She (he?) was hanging out with some friends on a recent Sunday night, drinkin' beer, when someone said, "Hey, it's Sunday night, we should go listen to Joe Frank." Read Jess' impressions at the following blogsite: "hey, it's Sunday night, we should go listen to Joe Frank." http://graffititheghost.blogspot.com/2005/04/joe-frank.html Harold J.